Spending Money On Experience Make You Happier.

If you've ever waffled over whether or not you should splurge on a big purchase like, say, a new car, or save up for that big trip to Europe you've always dreamed about you're not alone. A psychologist who has spent his life exploring the idea of living in the moment teamed up with a Cornell psychology professor and a doctoral candidate in an attempt to answer this question: does spending money on experiences make people happier than buying things?

We Appreciate Vacation More Than possession.

You didn't realize you hated your old couch until the exact moment you laid your eyes on an on-trend, blush-hued loveseat from a fancy furniture store's website. Sure, it's more than half your rent, and that trip to Mexico will have to be put on hold, but it's beautiful. You deserve it. Your excitement grows as you quickly confirm your purchase. Then, a strange thing happens...the couch takes forever to ship, making you a bit impatient. When it finally ships, you have to take time off work and wait for the dang thing to be delivered. You actually said no to a vacation for this?! According to Matthew Killingsworth, Thomas Gilovich, and Amit Kumar's 2014 study in the journal Psychological Science, that was a mistake.

As The Atlantic puts it, the emotion you feel while waiting for a material good, such as your trendy couch, to arrive is more likely to be impatience than excited anticipation. Plus, people get what's called a "hedonic adaptation," where things we're constantly exposed to just become background noise. How long will it take before your excitement over that new couch turns into the same hum-drum feeling you had for your old one?

That's all well and good, but experiences are fleeting too, aren't they? Yes, but not in the psychological sense. People feel more joy before, during, and long after an experience. This study claims that, unlike the impatience of waiting for your couch, waiting for a trip to Mexico with your friends would've been pleasant and exciting. Upon your return, the trip would give you a sense of nostalgia, with no risk of it disappearing into the background of your other daily thoughts. You know what you're getting when you purchase a couch—and it gets old—whereas the outcome of a vacation is somewhat mysterious. Not to mention, it's much more fun to hear stories about a crazy trip to Mexico than to hear about your velvet couch. (Just saying.)

You'll Thnak us Later.

Kumar notes to The Atlantic that this study's findings imply "notable real-world consequences." Gaining material possessions is often about instant gratification, putting on appearances, and keeping up with the Joneses. Buying experiences is associated more with identity and social connection. Kumar explains that if people are waiting in line for material goods, they're much more likely to treat each other badly (Black Friday shopping, anyone?). When people are waiting in line for an experience, such as a concert or a new brunch spot, they're more likely to stay positive and also be gracious and generous to others. You might enjoy looking at your new couch right now, but you'd forever be grateful for the time spent with friends drinking poolside margaritas.

Is there something you are curious about send us email and we will respond you as soon as possible. And if you like any specific topic and comment on a comment section and we will make a best article for you . Subscribe for more science related articles.

Does Money Buy Happiness ? That Depends On What Kind You Want.

We all know the tired cliché: "Money can't buy you happiness." But when you compare a Hollywood billionaire to someone who just got evicted from their apartment, the phrase starts to lose its meaning. Clearly, there's a certain amount of money that can mean the difference between happiness and misery. But what amount is that? In 2010, researchers decided to find out, and their answer was pretty interesting.

Day To Day Vs Big Picture.

For their study, which was published in the journal PNAS, Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deacon differentiated between two types of happiness. The first they called emotional well-being, defined as a person's day-to-day emotional experience—"the frequency and intensity of experiences of joy, stress, sadness, anger, and affection that make one's life pleasant or unpleasant," as the researchers put it. The second they called life evaluation, defined as the self-perception of one's life as a whole.

To gauge people's feelings on these two metrics, they asked 450,000 people questions about how they were feeling yesterday and how they see life as a whole, in addition to basic demographic information such as gender, age, and income. Questions about emotional experiences were things like "Did you feel stress during a lot of the day yesterday?" and "Did you smile or laugh a lot yesterday?" Life assessment, meanwhile, required people to imagine a ladder with numbered rungs—rung 0 at the bottom, representing the worst possible life, and rung 10 at the top, representing the best. The survey then asked, "On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?"

Pannies From heaven.

Here's what they found: when it comes to emotional well-being, money certainly does buy happiness—but only to a point. The more money you make, the more your day-to-day happiness improves, until you hit around $75,000 per year. After that, the improvement levels off. That means someone who makes $150,000 per year isn't likely to have a significantly happier day than someone making $75k. But when it comes to life evaluation? That's a whole different ballgame. No matter their income bracket, people who make more money have a more favorable evaluation of their own life as a whole. The study concluded that "high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being."

Why is this? Kahneman and Deacon have some ideas. "Low income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone," they write. It could be that once you have enough to weather the storms that head your way, it doesn't matter how much extra you make—your day-to-day life is pretty much stable. But, the researchers note, it's generally recognized that overall life evaluation is tied to your level of education, which in turn is tied to your income. In that way, the fact that money can buy you a positive assessment of your life makes sense. Maybe it's time we all asked for a raise.

So That is for now friend happiness series going . There is a lot to tell you . If you have any questions ask in the comments section. And i will try to respond as soon as possible .Thank you.and this is the book i want to recommend you to know more about happiness.

https://www.facebook.com/ankitsharmacool32/

How To Chose The Best Charity For Your Donation

The moment Thanksgiving is over in the U.S., the spending season begins: first there's Black Friday, then Cyber Monday. In 2012, Giving Tuesday arose as a way to celebrate altruism amid all the seasonal consumerism. But while most people probably check multiple buying guides and online reviews before choosing the products they order on Black Friday, few of us ever research the causes that get our donations. That's a mistake, because the charity you choose can make a massive difference in the impact your donation dollars have.

Eeny,Meeny,Miney,Mo

One of the most important choices you can make in your donation decision is which cause to support. Most people tend to go with a cause that's dear to their heart: maybe a relative has a certain disease, or you have personal experience with an important issue. The problem with choosing a charity this way is that if a cause immediately comes to your mind, it probably comes to the minds of a lot of people. That means that you're likely to choose a cause with a lot of support when you could have made your dollars go further with an issue that's less well known.

But there's another issue with choosing a charity this way. The fact is, a lot of charity programs don't work. Their heart is in the right place, but the numbers aren't: a 2015 literature survey found that of 90 educational interventions tested, 90 percent had "weak or no positive effects"; of employment-boosting programs, that figure was 75 percent.

So what's a good-hearted giver to do? A little extra research can ensure you get the biggest bang for your charity buck.

Put Your Money Where Your Mouse Is.

The nonprofit 80,000 Hours publishes a career guide for college graduates who want to make an impact on the world but don't know where to start. In it, they lay out the criteria they use to assess which issues are most urgent. According to them, the most pressing problems will have a good combination of the following characteristics:

• Scale: How big is the problem? How many lives does it affect? If we solved it today, how much would that benefit the world?
• Solvability: How easy is it to solve the problem? Do solutions already exist, and if so, how strong is the evidence behind them?
• Neglectedness: How many resources are already devoted to this problem? How many people know about it? Are there good reasons why it hasn't been solved yet?

Once you've chosen a cause, it's important to find out which solutions are best to put your dollar behind. Toby Ord, founder of Giving What We Can, uses the HIV/AIDS epidemic as an example.

Say you were considering supporting four interventions to fight AIDS: surgical treatment for an AIDS-related illness, antiretroviral therapy to fight the virus in people who are infected, prevention of transmission during pregnancy, condom distribution to prevent transmission on the whole, and education for the groups at highest risk of infection. Which one do you choose?

Without any research, you might think they're all just as cost effective. But in fact, the best of these is a whopping 1,400 times more cost-effective than the least: surgery barely registers on the chart, while education towers over the other methods. The more cost-effective the intervention, the more power your dollar has.

And don't discount putting money straight into the hands of the people who need it. Scientific evidence shows that when you give poor people money with no strings attached, they don't waste it. The charity GiveDirectly performed a randomized controlled trial in Kenya where they gave people different amounts of money and watched how they spent it. Overwhelmingly, the people spent the money on food and durable goods, often investing in livestock and building materials that helped secure their futures.

Once you've chosen a pressing issue with a cost-effective, evidence-based intervention, it's time to choose your charity. Sites like GuideStar, CharityNavigator, and CharityWatch are useful for rating charities themselves. They assess things like accountability, transparency, and financial health to make sure your donations are being used effectively and honestly. You can search the sites for the issues that you've chosen, and they'll show you the charities that can best put your donations to work to tackle the problem. After that, all that's left is to bask in the warm glow of charitable giving. That is for today guys meet you in a new science topic . If you like us then subscribe to get daily science article.